Fiscal policy rules in a stock-flow consistent model

Sylvio Antonio Kappes, Marcelo Milan

Abstract


The present paper analyzes four fiscal policy rules in a Stock-Flow Consistent model. The rules are: (i) government expenditures as a fixed proportion of GDP; (ii) government deficit as a fixed proportion of GDP; (iii) government debt as a fixed proportion of GDP; and (iv) a balanced budget. Then the economic trends implied by each rule are analyzed, and they are all compared. Some of the main findings can be summarized as follows: the more expansionist (or less contractionist) rules present higher growth rates, as expected; there is an inverse relationship between government debt and private debt, with the former being higher under the first rule, and lower in the balanced budget rule, the opposite happening in the case of private debt. Finally, considering enterprises’ profitability, we conclude that the best fiscal rule for firms is the first one, and, for the banking sector, also not surprisingly, it is the balanced budget rule.


Keywords


Fiscal policy; Stock-Flow Consistent Models;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benati, L; Lubik, T. A. (2014), “Sales, Inventories and Real Interest Rates: A Century of Stylized Facts”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, v. 29, n. 7, p. 1210-1222.

Blanchard, O. (2016), “Do DSGE models have a future?”, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Policy Brief 16-11.

Blanchard, O. J.; Leigh, D. (2013), “Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers”, American Economic Review, v. 103, n. 3, p. 117-120.

Borsi, M. T. (2016), “Fiscal multipliers across the credit cycle”, Banco de España, documentos de trabajo, n. 1618.

Burgess, S.; Burrows, O.; Godin, A.; Kinsella, S.; & Millard, S. (2016), “A dynamic model of financial balances for the United Kingdom”, Bank of England Staff Working Paper, n. 614.

Cavalcante, L. R.; De Negri, F. (2014), “Evolução recente dos indicadores de produtividade no brasil.” In.: De Negri, F.; Cavalcante, L. R. (Eds), Produtividade no Brasil: desempenho e determinantes – Volume 1: Desempenho. Brasília: ABDI, IPEA.

Dafermos, Y. (2012), “Liquidity preference, uncertainty, and recession in a stock-flow consistent model”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 34, n. 4, p. 749-776.

Denis, D. J.; Sibilkov, V. (2009), “Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings”, Review of Financial Studies, V. 23, Issue 1, p. 247–269.

Dos Santos, C.H. (2002), Three Essays in Stock-Flow Consistent Macroeconomic Modeling. PhD Dissertation, New School University.

Dos Santos, C. H.; Zezza, G. (2008), “A simplified, ‘benchmark’, stock‐flow consistent post‐keynesian growth model”, Metroeconomica, v. 59, n. 3, p. 441-478.

Fennell, P. G. O’Sullivan, D. J.; Godin, A.; Kinsella, S. (2016), “Is It Possible to Visualise Any Stock Flow Consistent Model as a Directed Acyclic Graph?”, Computational Economics, v. 48, 2, p. 307-316.

Godley, W. (1996), “Money, finance and national income determination: an integrated approach”, Working paper No. 167, Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.

Godley, W; Lavoie, M. (2007), Monetary Economics: an integrated approach to credit, money, income, production and wealth. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hatzius, J.; Stehn, J. (2012), “The US Economy in 2013-2016: Moving Over the Hump”, Goldman Sachs US Economics Analyst, issue N. 12/48.

IMF (2016), “Brazil”. IMF Country Report No. 16/348.

Kalecki, M. (1965), Theory of Economic Dynamics. 2nd edition, London: Allen and Unwin.

Keen, S. (2017), “The WHO warns of outbreak of virulent new 'Economic Reality' virus”, Review of Keynesian Economics, v. 5, n. 1.p. 107-111.

Klein, M. (2016), “Austerity and private debt”, Ruhr Economic Papers, No. 642.

Krugman, P. (2013), “Wynne Godley and the Hydraulics”, New York Times opinion pages, September 13. Available at Access on 01/17/ 2017.

Lavoie, M. (2008), “Financialisation issues in a Post-Keynesian stock-flow consistent model”, Interventions - European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, v. 5, n. 2, p. 335-361.

Lavoie, M; Godley, W. (2001-2002), “Kaleckian models of growth in a coherent stock-flow monetary framework: a Kaldorian view”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, v. 24, n. 2, p. 277-311.

Le Heron, E. (2012), A Debate with Wynne Godley on the Neutrality of Fiscal Policy. In.: Papadimitriou, D.; Zezza, G. Contributions to Stock-Flow Modeling: Essays in Honor of Wynne Godley. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Le Heron, E.; Mouakil, T. (2008), “A post‐keynesian stock‐flow consistent model for dynamic analysis of monetary policy shock on banking behaviour”, Metroeconomica, v. 59, n. 3, p. 405-440.

Mian, A. R.; Sufi, A; Verner, E. (2015), “Household debt and business cycles worldwide”, National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper nº. 21581.

Michell, J. (2016a), “On ‘heterodox’ macroeconomics”, August 9. Available at . Access on 01/17/2017.

Michell, J. (2016b), “Consistent modelling and inconsistent terminology”, September 8. Available at << https://criticalfinance.org/2016/09/08/consistent-modelling-and-inconsistent-terminology/>>. Access on 01/17/2017.

Ostry, J. D.; Loungani, P; and Furceri, D. (2016), “Neoliberalism: Oversold?”, Finance & Development, June, Vol. 53, No. 2, p. 38-41.

Pedrosa, I.; Macedo e Silva, A. C. (2015), “A Minskyan-Fisherian SFC model for analyzing the linkages of private financial behavior and public debt”, Presented at VIII International Conference of Brazilian Keynesian Association.

Romer, P. (2016), “The trouble with macroeconomics”, Available at: . Access on 04/23/2017.

Schlefer, J. (2013), “Embracing Wynne Godley, an Economist Who Modeled the Crisis”, The New York Times, sept. 10. Available at Access on 01/17/2017.

Smith, N. (2016), “Economics Without Math Is Trendy, But It Doesn't Add Up”, Bloomberg View, august 8. Available at . Access on 01//172017.

Steindl, J. (1952), Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wren-Lewis, S. (2016), “More on Stock-Flow Consistent models”, September 4. Available at . Access on 01/17/2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33834/bkr.v3i2.123

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Sylvio Antonio Kappes, Marcelo Milan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexed in

_________________________________________________________

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.